Search

James Izeluk

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
183 matches · 82W–101L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.04
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
30%
stay 3.0
70%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 74% stay · 26% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.95. Lower than today’s 3.04 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
38 of 134
NV · 3.0
49 of 166

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, James has gone from the 22nd to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
44.9%
31W–38L · 50.2% of games
3.5
31.7%
19W–41L · 42.2% of games
6.0mixed
68.8%
22W–10L · 55.9% of games
6.5mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 34% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history183 matches
L
STEPHANE BIRY / Kim Springermixed
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaCheyva Edmonis
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
4-1
W
William Weber
2026-07-21 · #1 Male Singles · 3.0
+0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Justin Menard
2026-07-14 · #1 Male Singles · 3.0
0.115below expectation — took 20% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Brandon Myers
2026-07-07 · #1 Male Singles · 3.0
0.010about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Jaekeun Cho / Jasper Kim
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Murillo
+0.036better than expected — took 47% of games against 36% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
John McCann
2026-04-18 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.052below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Shiniqual Washington / Jorel Washingtonmixed
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leticia Schoff
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Ryan Van / Amilton de Mello
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darin McKinney
+0.033better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
George Baggott / Robi Hintonmixed
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leticia Schoff
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 52% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Michael Villani / Geoffrey Thompson
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Paull
0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
John Shook / Heather Hartzellmixed
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gina Rivera
+0.000below expectation — took 55% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.