← Search

Shiniqual Washington

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 67W–61L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Shiniqual Washington to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-09-13 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Derek Clotfelter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-09-06 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabriel Quizon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Dellett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-08-05 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-02 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jorel Washington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gabriel Quizon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-08 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Francie Angelov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
72.7%
16W–6L · 57.7% of games
3.0
46.2%
24W–28L · 49.9% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 38.3% of games
5.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.7% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 48.4% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
26 matches
#2 Singles
11%
14 matches
#1 Singles
9%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer