← Search

Jeralyn Marchesi

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
406 matches · 217W–189L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeralyn Marchesi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history406 matches
W
2026-09-06 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ryan Marchesi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ryan Marchesi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-25 · TPC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Arbeli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-18 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vinne Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · TPC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Sager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · TPC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · TPC · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Radlosky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · TPC #2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ryan Marchesi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · TPC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Sager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · TPC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Arbeli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · TPC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Wadhams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ryan Marchesi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
64.4%
58W–32L · 53.7% of games
3.0
56.1%
111W–87L · 52.8% of games
3.5
32.2%
29W–61L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 68.3% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.3% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
88 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
83 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
52 matches
#1 Singles
4%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer