← Search

Jeralyn Marchesi

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
399 matches · 215W–184L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 69 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
8%
stay 3.0
92%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 50% stay · 50% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.00. Lower than today’s 3.11 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
22 of 134
NV · 3.0
28 of 166

Jeralyn is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jeralyn has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jeralyn has gone from the 19th to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
2.5
64.4%
58W–32L · 53.7% of games
3.0
57%
110W–83L · 53% of games
3.5
32.6%
29W–60L · 42.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
11W–0L · 68.3% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history399 matches
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Radlosky
+0.011better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Mary Ann Apone / Jeannie Collins
2026-07-23 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Sager
−0.025about as expected — took 80% of games against 78% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Arbeli
+0.009about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Lynda Valenzuela / Lucilene Ibiapina
2026-07-20 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Wadhams
+0.014better than expected — took 86% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Valerie Witherspoon / Matthew Murillomixed
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ryan Marchesi
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 38% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Prexy Tamayo / Leticia Schoff
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Smith
+0.013better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Laura Vasquez
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
−0.024below expectation — took 59% of games against 66% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Charlotte Durisseau / Maureen Kelly
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leticia Schoff
−0.019about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Casey Primmer
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Candace Sartini
−0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chandra VanPaepeghem
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Tanya Hale / Angela Stevens
2026-05-20 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Galli
+0.006about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Sean Ono / Linda Onomixed
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ryan Marchesi
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.