Search

Golssa Moridi

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
318 matches · 104W–214L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 44 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
79%
stay 3.0
21%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.87. Lower than today’s 2.94 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
60 of 134
NV · 3.0
75 of 166

Golssa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Golssa has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Golssa has gone from the 11th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
31.9%
43W–92L · 43.9% of games
3.0
32.1%
45W–95L · 42.6% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 39.2% of games
5.5mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 43% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history318 matches
L
Jeralyn Marchesi / Kristen Radlosky
2026-07-29 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryam Kaveh
0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jennifer Lake / Nadine Kluger
2026-07-27 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Pierce
+0.022better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 3-2
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Female Singles · 3.5
+0.013about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
Brittany Carlson / Renee Johnson
2026-07-15 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryam Kaveh
+0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Maureen Kelly / Charlotte Durisseau
2026-07-13 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Dellett
+0.017better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Joni Kerby / Courtney Beine
2026-07-08 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Pierce
+0.016about as expected — took 37% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Fhretscya Youmans
2026-07-06 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.068better than expected — took 100% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Rachel Glaze
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.010about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Kim Springer
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Juli Kochanski / Valerie Valow-Orris
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Pierce
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.