← Search

Ken Kesick

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 145W–68L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ken Kesick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-09-06 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Yang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-30 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Stowe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-11 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with James Mcclary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-08-02 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Stowe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Yang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
Christopher Madsen / Nicholas Trujillo
2026-07-21 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Stritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Yang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · DTC #1 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with STEPHANE BIRY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Venetia Espinueva championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Venetia Espinueva championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
76.8%
43W–13L · 62.9% of games
3.5
63.3%
31W–18L · 57.9% of games
4.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.1% of games
6.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 61% of games
7.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 62.3% of games
6.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.4% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 56% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
38 matches
#1 Male Doubles
6%
12 matches
#2 Male Doubles
5%
11 matches
#3 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams