← Search

Jenna DeLong

Sandy, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 71W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jenna DeLong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
W
2026-09-12 · SM- Tennisaurus-DeLong · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Rynders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · SL Tennis-Sweet/Smathers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cari Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-09-01 · SL Tennis-Sweet/Smathers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karol Liced Sanchez Vanegas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-28 · SM- Tennisaurus · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jonathan Cassidy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-25 · SL Tennis-Sweet/Smathers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie DeLong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-21 · Torres-tial Smash · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tyler Findlay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-08-14 · SM- Tennisaurus · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jonathan Cassidy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · TorresNado · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hailey Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · TorresNado · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Franko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · TorresNado · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kate Franko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · Torres-tial Smash · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Isaza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-20 · TorresNado · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shana Seely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 56.1% of games
2.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 55.2% of games
3.0
51%
25W–24L · 49.1% of games
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.8% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 69.3% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe