← Search

Rebecca Rynders

Salt Lake City, UT
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 34W–24L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Rynders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-09-12 · SM- Tennisaurus-DeLong · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna DeLong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-09-09 · Sports Mall-Stroud-Peterson/Rynders · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chantel Wall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-27 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Sweat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
Julianne Thibodeaux / Lyndsey Packham
2026-07-20 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Naomi Stroud-Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Jamie Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Sweat championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Annie Mortensen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Mortensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
2.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.4% of games
3.0
55.3%
21W–17L · 53.5% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#1 Singles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova