← Search

Caryl Fletcher

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 143W–124L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Caryl Fletcher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history267 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Court Smashers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Isabel Cristina Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-02 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Heimuli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · ACES-Swalberg/Harman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with KayeLynn BASTIAN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Nancy Matz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Matz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandy Weeks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Pettit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · Utah/Swalberg/55&O/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Pettit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Pettit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Beckstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Denise Dennie / Shannon Child
2026-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
58.9%
109W–76L · 52.9% of games
3.5
25.6%
11W–32L · 39.2% of games
6.0
60%
9W–6L · 53% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
63 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
22 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova