← Search

Britta Davis

Heber City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 36W–45L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Britta Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-09-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Naomi Stroud-Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shawna Smart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Naomi Stroud-Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Overton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Porsche Gardner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Red Ledges-Coady · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lyndsey Packham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Archibald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Bridget Llewellyn / Kelley Schorn
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
40%
12W–18L · 46.4% of games
3.0
63.6%
21W–12L · 52.3% of games
3.5
7.7%
1W–12L · 37.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#1 Singles
20%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer