← Search

Bridget Llewellyn

Park City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 54W–54L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Bridget Llewellyn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-08-25 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Schorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Romina Fabiani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Rothkopf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-5
W
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Krueger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelley Schorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Schorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joyce Krawiecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-05-27 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-20 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-13 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katy Patterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
52.4%
33W–30L · 50.9% of games
3.0
41.7%
15W–21L · 48.8% of games
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 66% of the time
#1 Doubles
66%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
5 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams