← Search

Terri Brunner

Sandy, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
288 matches · 145W–143L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Terri Brunner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history288 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Fall Orange Crush · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Trentman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-25 · Fall Orange Crush · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Leishman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Jennifer Wily / Jennifer Wells
2026-08-11 · #4 Doubles · with Shelly Kemp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-1
W
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · with Shelly Kemp championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hayley Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50.4%
120W–118L · 49.5% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
65%
13W–7L · 53.2% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 60.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
107 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
93 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
59 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer