Teams

Orange Crush

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesMary Sorensen / Kathi Poggi vs Carly Johnston / Shana Wood4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesKathi Poggi / Ann Trentman vs Romina Fabiani / Joyce Krawiecki6-1, 7-6
2026-06-26Won 20
W#2 DoublesAllison Leishman / Maryam Klock vs Shana Wood / Megan Overton6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathi Poggi / Mary Sorensen vs Britta Davis / Tracy Davis6-2, 6-2
2026-06-16vs Park City MARC-Krueger/SianoLost 02
L#2 DoublesLisa Ewing / Allison Leishman vs Katy Patterson / Kelly Krueger4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathi Poggi / Mary Sorensen vs Lisa Hauser / Brittany Schuhmacher2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Lisa Ewing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.28
Hannah Lee
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.22
Jamie DeLong
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Trentman
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.14
Kathi Poggi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Terri Brunner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Maryam Klock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Byington
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Shelly Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
Allison Leishman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Mary Sorensen
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published
2.70
Rebecca Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathi Poggi + Shelly Kemp2348% games+9.4% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Lisa Ewing5257% games+6.2% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Hannah Lee5258% games+5.0% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Terri Brunner9852% games+4.6% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Hannah Lee3253% games+2.7% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Terri Brunner161748% games+2.0% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Allison Leishman4443% games+1.5% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Kathi Poggi5160% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Ewing
122W–123L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Hannah Lee
103W–77L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Jamie DeLong
171W–129L career · 10 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
198W–228L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Ann Trentman
186W–245L career · 13 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Kathi Poggi
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Terri Brunner
142W–142L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Maryam Klock
77W–92L career · 10 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Linda Byington
78W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Shelly Kemp
141W–135L career · 8 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–210L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Mary Sorensen
43W–45L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Rebecca Anderson
45W–63L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.