← Search

Jennifer Tooley

FARMINGTON, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
429 matches · 199W–230L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Tooley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history429 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Fall Orange Crush · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Francie Peters / Kelly Singer
2026-08-25 · Fall Orange Crush · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Byington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Wecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · Tri-to-Fly · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · Tri-to-Fly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Knudsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Sorensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · Tri-to-Fly · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary HENSLEY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maryam Klock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Wecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
58.2%
89W–64L · 54.5% of games
3.5
40.7%
99W–144L · 46.7% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
127 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
125 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
90 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
27 matches
#1 Singles
5%
21 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King