← Search

Lisa Beames

SANDY, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
297 matches · 158W–139L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Beames to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history297 matches
L
Michelle Hansen / Ashley Bailey
2026-08-12 · #4 Doubles · with Kristel Affleck championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosemary Glines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Angelyn Sorenson / Jennifer Evans
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristel Affleck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Rachel Mills / Maria Brockbank
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelly Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Criddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
Leslie Goldman Tepper / Sandee Kozel
2026-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelley Petersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Knowlton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 61.9% of games
3.0
63.1%
65W–38L · 55.4% of games
3.5
49.6%
60W–61L · 48.5% of games
4.0
30.3%
10W–23L · 45.7% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
58 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
30 matches
#1 Singles
7%
22 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer