← Search

Alison Pearce

Bountiful, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
373 matches · 171W–202L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alison Pearce to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history373 matches
L
2026-08-28 · Eccles- Denos/Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carl Culver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-25 · Cottonwood Club-Summerhays/Winson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Turley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · Eccles- Denos/Miller · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dali Licul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindy Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindy Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Heitner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindy Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · Eccles- Denos/Miller · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Randy Woodward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mikelle Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camille Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Child
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams69 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
69.6%
16W–7L · 59% of games
3.0
53.6%
75W–65L · 51.7% of games
3.5
32.8%
44W–90L · 45.3% of games
4.0
25%
3W–9L · 39.5% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 53.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 22% of the time
#2 Doubles
22%
83 matches
#1 Singles
22%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
63 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
26 matches
#2 Singles
5%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer