← Search

Kassie Torres

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
300 matches · 181W–119L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kassie Torres to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history300 matches
W
2026-09-11 · They Torres Up · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with McKay Renstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · They Torres Up · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fernando Torres mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-21 · Torres Down the Line · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Novom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · TorresNado · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · They Torres Up · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fernando Torres mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-20 · TorresNado · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · Torres Down the Line · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeremy Gravell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-13 · TorresNado · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Spruill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-26 · Torres Down the Line · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Novom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Dylan Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Dylan Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Pfister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
0.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.3% of games
2.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 66.7% of games
3.0
73.3%
33W–12L · 59.8% of games
3.5
55.9%
38W–30L · 52.9% of games
4.0
60%
12W–8L · 47.7% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 32% of games
6.0
50%
6W–6L · 47.3% of games
7.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.3% of games
5.5mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 61.4% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 57.6% of games
6.5mixed
94.1%
16W–1L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 51.6% of games
7.5mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 56.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 38.7% of games
8.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
86 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
76 matches
#2 Female Doubles
6%
17 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
14 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King