← Search

Rina Benson

Midway, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 119W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rina Benson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-08-13 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Labrum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deyce Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-23 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kalee King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-17 · RL- Berg · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Harry Waldie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Chieko Perry / Kristin Baker
2026-06-23 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jocelyn Bennion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · with Amber Greenwood championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Nikki Mower / Jennifer Jensen
2026-04-30 · Heber Valley Tennis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-16 · Heber Valley Tennis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
68%
102W–48L · 58.1% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.2% of games
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams