Teams

Heber Valley Tennis

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W AM

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-28vs SunPro-Warren/CarterLost 02
L#1 SinglesCheryl A McCullough vs Lisa Moncur2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Tagge / Heidi Clark vs Rachel Hatch / Seidi Bennett2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-21vs Sports Mall-AdamsWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Mills / Anna Ziebarth vs Wilhelmina Hoggan / Lindie Hoggan6-1, 6-2
2026-05-14Split 11
L#2 DoublesRina Benson / Amber Greenwood vs Kat Fuller / Christy Owens7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKalee King / Anna Ziebarth vs Trisha Cutrer / Emily Waltman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-07Lost 02
L#2 DoublesHeidi Clark / Rachel Labrum vs Renee Utgaard / Miglena Aaron3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheryl A McCullough / Stephanie Tagge vs Rachel Mills / Jacki Joseph2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-30vs Eagleridge-MowerWon 20
W#1 DoublesRina Benson / Nicole Mills vs Nikki Mower / Jennifer Jensen7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHeather Probst / Rachel Labrum vs Tara Wood / Lisa Beames6-0, 6-3
2026-04-23vs Ivory Ridge-Bullington/FairbanksWon 30
W#2 DoublesKalee King / Rachel Labrum vs Sharlene Enloe / Amy Allen6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMegan Pinter vs Jaevonna Beck6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnna Ziebarth / Rachel Ray vs Heather Jensen / Heather Allen6-3, 6-2
2026-04-16vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksWon 20
W#2 DoublesAmber Greenwood / Rina Benson vs Sherree Greenhalgh / Teresa Polistina6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDeyce Peterson / Anna Ziebarth vs Megan Rusconi / Cathy Mclevish4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-09vs SunPro-Warren/CarterLost 02
L#2 DoublesRina Benson / Kalee King vs Shauna Carter / Jennifer Napierski7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMegan Pinter vs Brittany Southam2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Deyce Peterson
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.94
Meghan Tuohig
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.89
Heather Probst
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Mandy Berg
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Rina Benson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Carly Reese
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.83
Rachel Labrum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Kalee King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Amber Greenwood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.70
Anna Ziebarth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Stephanie Tagge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Megan Pinter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.55
Angie Neuberger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Nicole Mills
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.38
Cheryl A McCullough
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Heidi Clark
published
Lisa Caldwell
published
Rachel Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Labrum + Carly Reese10561% games+12.3% vs expected
Carly Reese + Heather Probst8167% games+11.2% vs expected
Amber Greenwood + Deyce Peterson5166% games+9.9% vs expected
Rina Benson + Amber Greenwood11367% games+8.3% vs expected
Kalee King + Mandy Berg7462% games+7.7% vs expected
Rachel Labrum + Heather Probst8263% games+7.2% vs expected
Amber Greenwood + Heidi Clark161157% games+5.6% vs expected
Deyce Peterson + Heather Probst48764% games+5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deyce Peterson
169W–42L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
Meghan Tuohig
40W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Heather Probst
114W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Mandy Berg
176W–112L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Rina Benson
119W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Carly Reese
178W–87L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Rachel Labrum
94W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Kalee King
117W–93L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Amber Greenwood
155W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Anna Ziebarth
20W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Stephanie Tagge
11W–24L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Megan Pinter
4W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Angie Neuberger
75W–76L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Nicole Mills
91W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Cheryl A McCullough
87W–59L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
3.38
Heidi Clark
49W–37L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Caldwell
7W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Ray
65W–33L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.