← Search

Kalee King

Heber City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
211 matches · 118W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kalee King to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history211 matches
W
2026-07-27 · Heber Volley Gals · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Pinter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-20 · Heber Volley Gals · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angie Neuberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · Heber Volley Gals · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Pinter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Labrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deyce Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anna Ziebarth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams70 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
59.8%
98W–66L · 53% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 43.4% of games
8.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
52 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
12 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe