← Search

DeeAnn Henderson

Sandy, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
479 matches · 269W–210L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 40 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
24%
down to 3.5
76%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.59. Higher than today’s 3.56 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
UT · 4.0
144 of 164
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
DeeAnn is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

DeeAnn has played at 2.5, 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.54.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, DeeAnn has gone from the 7th to the 23rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level14 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 64.1% of games
2.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 63.5% of games
3.0
64.4%
38W–21L · 56.1% of games
3.5
66.7%
62W–31L · 57% of games
4.0
41.1%
51W–73L · 47.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 59.2% of games
8.0
25%
4W–12L · 41.6% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 55.2% of games
6.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 54.3% of games
7.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 58.5% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.6% of games
8.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history479 matches
L
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marsha Elmore
+0.005about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Donna Pizza / Jayne Coffing
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Benton
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Maxfield
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-3
W
Misty Morrow / Lisa Ewing
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Marriott
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
W
Lee Mccullough / Cheryl A McCulloughmixed
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Lee
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debi Johnson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
L
JaNae Smith / Trisha Cutrer
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Marriott
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
Lisa Mayberry / Donna Pizza
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debi Johnson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-3
L
Amber Thompson / Alyson Ellis
2026-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Cronin
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
W
Maria Brockbank / Crystal Spackman
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Tagge
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Marriott
+0.008about as expected — took 37% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Chieko Perry / Kristin Baker
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Marriott
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.