← Search

Kim Cronin

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
619 matches · 380W–239L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Cronin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history619 matches
L
2026-09-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Moscon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-03 · SLT-Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Villareal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · SLT-Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teri Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Ewing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angela Bleak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Moscon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Bleak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Maxfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Moscon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Love
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams118 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
85.2%
69W–12L · 66.5% of games
3.5
77.6%
135W–39L · 60.5% of games
4.0
49.2%
120W–124L · 49.7% of games
4.5
19%
4W–17L · 37.8% of games
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 65.7% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 53.2% of games
7.5mixed
50%
8W–8L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
248 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
189 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
113 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
27 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
19 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert