← Search

Charlotte Trahan

Park City, UT
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
191 matches · 127W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Charlotte Trahan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-09-03 · PC MARC Greenhalgh-Brooks · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susel Weight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susel Weight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susel Weight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susel Weight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelley Epstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Nunnelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · PC MARC-Leigh/Killian · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Massae Sato MacIunas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · PC MARC-Leigh/Killian · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susel Weight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-22 · PC MARC-Leigh/Killian · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin Killian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susel Weight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-22 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Killian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susel Weight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
77.7%
87W–25L · 61.5% of games
4.0
47.1%
24W–27L · 48.2% of games
8.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
38 matches
#1 Singles
17%
32 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova