← Search

Jane McQuade

Ogden, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
449 matches · 268W–181L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane McQuade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history449 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ann Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sue Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Sorenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · Full Metal Racquets · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chris Bleak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracey Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-4
W
2026-07-06 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Hutton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sue Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Sorenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cathy Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams103 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.6% of games
4.5
59%
79W–55L · 53% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games
8.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 54.8% of games
9.0
59.2%
29W–20L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
80.9%
38W–9L · 61.4% of games
8.5mixed
62.1%
18W–11L · 52% of games
9.0mixed
65%
26W–14L · 55.2% of games
9.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
203 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
145 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
99 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal