← Search

Chris Bleak

Lehi, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 163W–100L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chris Bleak to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history263 matches
W
2026-08-14 · Full Metal Racquets · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Woolley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-08 · Full Metal Racquets · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Savage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Hiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · Full Metal Racquets · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jane McQuade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Bankhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jared Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brady Rasmussen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · Full Metal Racquets · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Foy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fred Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Timothy Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Timothy Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.2% of games
3.5
84.2%
16W–3L · 59.1% of games
4.0
69.4%
68W–30L · 58% of games
4.5
43.3%
13W–17L · 47% of games
6.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 68.1% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.4% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 52% of games
8.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 47.9% of games
9.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
70 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer