← Search

Brady Rasmussen

Salt Lake City, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 113W–90L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Brady Rasmussen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
W
2026-08-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Devin Liljenquist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Hiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-07 · RL- Berg · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexandra Patricia Mears mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Enloe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-31 · RL- Berg · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Schulz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Nielson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Hiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Blake Wakefield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Bleak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 31.4% of games
4.0
69.8%
74W–32L · 57% of games
4.5
36.6%
15W–26L · 45.9% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.3% of games
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.8% of games
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
59 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe