← Search

Ryan Fyfe

RIVERTON, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
168 matches · 90W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ryan Fyfe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Eccles-Patrick · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sasha Prevedel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-21 · Eccles-Patrick · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Juliet Hanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · New Daddy’s · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hudson Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
Adam Coleman / Tim Lloyd
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Annen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Jarrett Rummel / Jonas Griffel
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Hudson Martin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Andrew Cavallino championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kala Riester mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · Eccles-Patrick · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Haley H Moreno mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-17 · SM- Henderson/Arun · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kala Riester mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
Christopher Bratcher / Derek Stone
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Annen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Hudson Martin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Timothy Smith / Chris Bleak
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Annen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.1% of games
4.0
65.5%
38W–20L · 54.1% of games
4.5
0%
0W–4L · 38.3% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.9% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.6% of games
8.5mixed
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.6% of games
9.0mixed
41.4%
12W–17L · 46.9% of games
9.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#1 Singles
10%
17 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer