Search

Daigo Ishikawa

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
357 matches · 218W–139L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.75
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 34 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
49 of 129
NV · 4.0
72 of 203

Daigo is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Daigo has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Daigo has gone from the 86th to the 57th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
70.1%
75W–32L · 57.9% of games
4.5
47.7%
21W–23L · 45.7% of games
7.0mixed
73.5%
25W–9L · 63% of games
7.5mixed
68.6%
24W–11L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
56.4%
31W–24L · 55.2% of games
8.5mixed
68%
17W–8L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history357 matches
L
Rajeev Sharma / Morgan Daleymixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Desiree Kathmann
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Jenny Grob / Conor Spiegelmixed
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Desiree Kathmann
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Jeff Thompson / Liz Givenchamps
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Natasha Kattau
0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Allen Morgan / David Morganchamps
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Taylor Verhaalen
+0.025better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Scott Baker / Michael Borensteinchamps
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Rajeev Sharma
+0.011about as expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Michael Springer / Darin Hoeselchamps
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Karl Robinson
+0.016better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
Jeremy Christensen / Patrick ONeill
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kandarp Bhatt
+0.016better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Francine Mazza / Michael Borensteinchamps
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Natasha Kattau
0.004about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Enhua Chen / Kara Godfreychamps
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Alex Farley Messer
0.032below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Patrick Cronin / Jackson Olsen
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert Quimson
0.031below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Alex Schrack / Allan-Robert Peetsalumixed
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natasha Kattau
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Desiree Kathmann
+0.000below expectation — took 54% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.