Search

Milo Berger

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
239 matches · 140W–99L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.15
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 4.0
97%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.5
9 of 39
NV · 4.5
14 of 61

Milo is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Milo has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Milo has gone from the 37th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
64.4%
38W–21L · 54.9% of games
4.5
61.7%
66W–41L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
45%
9W–11L · 48% of games
8.5mixed
67.9%
19W–9L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history239 matches
W
LOURDES MENDOZA / Philip Tompkinsmixed
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Yokoyama
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mathew Dees
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katherine Yokoyama
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
David Oraee / Belinda Smithmixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Vermeys
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
Tyler Gaston / Nick Arriola
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Golomb
0.036below expectation — took 50% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Nathaniel Yost / Tom Mullin
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Golomb
+0.012better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Karl Robinson / Mimi Liumixed
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jules Mitchell
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Golomb
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Christine DeLisle / Luciano Pardomixed
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lesley Chan
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Steve Mihas / Michael de Amicis
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Riley Stahley
+0.017better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
Lindsey White / Brian Maiermixed
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lesley Chan
+0.000better than expected — took 43% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Varun Desai / Jaclyn Bermudezmixed
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Devon Allgower
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.