Search

Matt Szen

LAS VEGAS, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
102 matches · 78W–24L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.28
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
100%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 4.5
7 of 61

Matt is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has been a steady 4.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

4.04.520252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Matt has gone from the 74th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
77.8%
28W–8L · 59.9% of games
5.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 60% of games
8.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 68% of games
9.0mixed
85.7%
24W–4L · 58.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history102 matches
L
Belinda Smith / David Oraeemixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jaclyn Bermudez
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Mathew Dees / Milo Berger
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Malta
0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rachel Calderon Young
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Morgan Daley / Rajeev Sharmamixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tami Vannah
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Vincent Tessier / Jason Tang
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nevin Sahni
+0.018better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Chrys Castro-Vargas / Rachel Calderon Youngchamps
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Morgan Daley
0.006about as expected — took 46% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Stephen Slubar / Jaclyn Bermudezchamps
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · with Morgan Daley
0.052below expectation — took 47% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Stephen Slubar / Jaclyn Bermudezchamps
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · with Morgan Daley
0.077below expectation — took 46% of games against 70% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Beckham Butler / Nathan Rose
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander van der Enden
0.052below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Morgan Daley
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
James Mori / Adam Gratz
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brett Condon
0.010about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Nakul Jariwala / Brigitte Fallonmixed
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Morgan Daley
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.