← Search

Kyle Knecht

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
304 matches · 237W–67L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kyle Knecht to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history304 matches
W
2026-09-09 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jack Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-09-06 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Witherspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gordon Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Witherspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gordon Hammond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Teddy Stantcheva mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Witherspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Witherspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brennan Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brennan Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valerie Witherspoon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brennan Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 70.2% of games
3.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 68.6% of games
4.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.2% of games
4.5
67.2%
43W–21L · 54.1% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
100%
6W–0L · 62.3% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 68.7% of games
6.5mixed
100%
7W–0L · 68.3% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
100%
38W–0L · 67.1% of games
8.5mixed
81%
17W–4L · 60.7% of games
9.0mixed
70%
21W–9L · 56.9% of games
9.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
131 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
57 matches
#1 Singles
6%
19 matches
#2 Singles
6%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe