Search

Robert Wark

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
240 matches · 141W–99L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
3%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.81. Lower than today’s 3.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
5 of 51
NV · 4.0
25 of 210

Robert is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Robert has been 4.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Robert has gone from the 89th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.0
72.7%
48W–18L · 58.6% of games
4.5
53.3%
32W–28L · 52.2% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 52.1% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 52.5% of games
8.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 52% of games
9.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history240 matches
L
Mike Burgoyne / Rajeev Sharma
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josiah Garlan
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Caitlin Murphy
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christi Lin
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Maverick Yabut / Peyman Bastanichamps
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Marco Borremans
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Jason Tang / Josiah Garlanchamps
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with David Dendy
+0.034better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Allen Morgan / David Morganchamps
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Marco Borremans
+0.050better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Shaun Yokoyama / Josh Benson
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Riley Stahley
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Daniel Dragnev / Jennifer Cribbchamps
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Sofia Nuno
+0.017better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brad Golomb
+0.014better than expected — took 63% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Nicolas Csere / Ui Afualomixed
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami Vannah
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Lwin
0.037below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.