← Search

Amy Nhaisi

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
527 matches · 272W–255L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Nhaisi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history527 matches
W
2026-09-08 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-07 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Cunningham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-09-06 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Robert Wark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Cribb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-01 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shani Ma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Troy Fenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-21 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams96 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 34% of games
3.5
60.9%
131W–84L · 55.5% of games
4.0
36.6%
63W–109L · 45.2% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
74.4%
32W–11L · 59.5% of games
8.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.8% of games
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
48.1%
13W–14L · 48.1% of games
7.5mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.3% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
212 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
136 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
124 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
12 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova