← Search

Lindsey Lanni

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
309 matches · 185W–124L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.76
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
44 of 129
NV · 4.0
65 of 203

Lindsey is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lindsey has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Lindsey has gone from the 24th to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level13 levels played
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 70.2% of games
3.0
72%
18W–7L · 63.2% of games
3.5
65.1%
41W–22L · 57.3% of games
4.0
57%
77W–58L · 53.1% of games
4.5
47.2%
17W–19L · 47.9% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.8% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history309 matches
W
Ruth-Ann Edwards / Andrea Conway
2026-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Pettet
+0.052better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Camille Solla
2026-05-02 · #2 Singles · 4.5
−0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madisen Cherry
+0.015better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn McCullough
−0.004about as expected — took 46% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-04-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
+0.008better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
Heather Morganson / Christine Blake
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
+0.018better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-04-10 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn McCullough
−0.014below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
−0.010about as expected — took 68% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
Lesley Chan / Alexander Martinmixed
2026-04-01 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adam Barr
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
−0.005about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Pettet
−0.015below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
V Kate Ferguson / Thalia Vidal Roper
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn McCullough
+0.013about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.