← Search

Lindsey Lanni

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
312 matches · 187W–125L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Lindsey Lanni to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history312 matches
W
2026-09-01 · TPC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Candra Milohnic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
Julieanna Edge / Sophia Medellin
2026-08-05 · SPANISH OAKS #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · TPC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Elwart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-04 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Pettet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-01 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madisen Cherry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · SPANISH OAKS · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-20 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-04-10 · SPANISH OAKS · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-06 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-04-01 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Adam Barr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 70.2% of games
3.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 63.6% of games
3.5
67.6%
46W–22L · 57.8% of games
4.0
56%
79W–62L · 52.7% of games
4.5
37.9%
11W–18L · 45.3% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.8% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
94 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
74 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
33 matches
#1 Singles
5%
14 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer