Search

Candra Milohnic

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
459 matches · 272W–187L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 37 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
59 of 129
NV · 4.0
83 of 203

Candra is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Candra has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Candra has gone from the 33rd to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
64.9%
179W–97L · 56.2% of games
4.5
46.8%
37W–42L · 49.7% of games
5.0
100%
4W–0L · 63.5% of games
8.0mixed
49%
24W–25L · 51.2% of games
8.5mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history459 matches
L
Jenny Grob / Christine Blake
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kayla Blum
+0.009about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Hollander
0.024below expectation — took 43% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Michael Borenstein / Ava Nhaisimixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Paul Hollander
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · with Michaela Stevens
+0.016better than expected — took 60% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Hayley Hollander
0.037below expectation — took 29% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Grace Nemec / Jennifer Togliatti
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Bucquet
0.002about as expected — took 58% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Mari K Bradley / Jason Schieckmixed
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Little
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Marijo Peterson / Shellene Goudge
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Cerny
+0.011better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Amy Nhaisi / Diane Welch
2026-05-11 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Stephenson
0.026below expectation — took 53% of games against 63% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Christine Blake / Jenny Grob
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Hollander
0.030below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Rebecca Little / Allison Richards
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kendalyn Hartsock
+0.020better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Betsy Pettet / K C Scherrer
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Hollander
+0.024better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.