← Search

Amanda Zommick

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
392 matches · 261W–131L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
37 of 129
NV · 4.0
54 of 203

Amanda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amanda has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Amanda has gone from the 39th to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
74.2%
23W–8L · 65% of games
4.0
72.1%
189W–73L · 58.1% of games
4.5
52.8%
38W–34L · 50.6% of games
5.0
40%
2W–3L · 39.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history392 matches
W
Shani Ma / Cynthia Graham
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teddy Stantcheva
+0.019better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Drea Jones / Lan Duong
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karin de Amicis
−0.041below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Teddy Stantcheva
−0.033below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katelyn McCullough
−0.027below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huong Nardelli
−0.032below expectation — took 52% of games against 64% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
Jessica Berger / Elisabeth Golden
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Anderson
+0.184better than expected — took 90% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 3-0
W
Barbara Fair / Denise Mandelbaum
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huong Nardelli
+0.006about as expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Pham
−0.049below expectation — took 40% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W
Angela Lobato / K C Scherrer
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Pettet
−0.006about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
Lisa Ross / Marijo Peterson
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Pettet
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Katelyn Glenn / Seda Sargsyan
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claudia Sleet
−0.033below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with K C Scherrer
−0.019about as expected — took 65% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.