← Search

Christine McNaught

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
296 matches · 136W–160L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christine McNaught to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history296 matches
L
2026-06-06 · ANTHEM CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth-Ann Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · ANTHEM CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irena Khin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-04 · ANTHEM CC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aly Wagonseller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-02 · ANTHEM CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Alred
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-04-20 · ANTHEM CC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aly Wagonseller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-18 · ANTHEM CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruth-Ann Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-06 · ANTHEM CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Morganson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-30 · ANTHEM CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with JACKIE EDLUND
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · ANTHEM CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Wysong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-21 · ANTHEM CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Fair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · ANTHEM CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Alred
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-09 · ANTHEM CC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with JACKIE EDLUND
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
55.9%
100W–79L · 53.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
31W–62L · 45.1% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0%
0W–7L · 28% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
122 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
33 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams