Search

Teisha Hunsaker

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
181 matches · 92W–89L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
22 of 73
NV · 3.5
81 of 228

Teisha is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Teisha has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Teisha has gone from the 51st to the 51st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 49.7% of games
3.0
57.6%
19W–14L · 53.6% of games
3.5
53.9%
48W–41L · 52.6% of games
4.0
32%
8W–17L · 43.8% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history181 matches
W
Chelsea Gray / Anne Gumm
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Seda Sargsyan
+0.036better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Michelle Castillo / Stella Chivikas
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Gumm
0.028below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Hong Lee / Sally Zimmerman
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Sisneros
0.024below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori LaBarbera
0.015about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyree Judd
+0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 25% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Allison Ibarguen / Vanessa Nicole Rowe
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Colbert
0.003about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Colbert
0.014below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jen Sisneros
+0.014better than expected — took 65% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
Amy Levasseur / Tanya Hale
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tyree Judd
+0.014better than expected — took 50% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Adrian Cutolo / Melanie Isbell
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Colbert
0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Josephine McPeak / Tricia Miller
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Banks
+0.004about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tricia Colbert
+0.020better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.