Search

Joanna Banks

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
169 matches · 107W–62L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
79 of 129
NV · 4.0
111 of 203

Joanna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joanna has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Joanna has gone from the 53rd to the 6th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
72.5%
50W–19L · 59.3% of games
4.0
55.3%
42W–34L · 49.4% of games
7.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 68% of games
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history169 matches
L
Lan Duong / Gayl Fitzgerald
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
+0.028better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Josephine McPeak / Tricia Miller
2026-04-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teisha Hunsaker
+0.004about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Diane Welch / Amy Nhaisi
2026-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
+0.016better than expected — took 58% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
0.069below expectation — took 0% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Sarah Merwin / Mimi Liu
2026-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Stephanie Chen / Marcy Saxe
2026-02-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
0.015below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
0.028below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-12-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Rebecca Little / Elizabeth McManus
2025-12-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicole Lefebvre
+0.010better than expected — took 53% of games against 46% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Nicole Lefebvre / Jen Liong
2025-12-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Miller
0.021below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Esther Tan / Sophy Feng
2025-11-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
0.040below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-20 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nilda Chang
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.