← Search

Joanna Banks

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
169 matches · 107W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joanna Banks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history169 matches
L
2026-05-04 · DTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · DTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teisha Hunsaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-13 · DTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-23 · DTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-09 · DTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-02-23 · DTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-02 · DTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-08 · DTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-04 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nicole Lefebvre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-01 · DTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-24 · DTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-20 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nilda Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
72.5%
50W–19L · 59.3% of games
4.0
55.3%
42W–34L · 49.4% of games
7.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 68% of games
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 52.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
43 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova