← Search

Jen Liong

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
138 matches · 58W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.42
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
84%
stay 3.5
16%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.36. Lower than today’s 3.42 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
38 of 139
NV · 3.5
49 of 228

Jen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jen has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jen has gone from the 46th to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.6% of games
4.0
42%
34W–47L · 47.8% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.1% of games
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.5% of games
8.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 43.1% of games
8.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 39.3% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history138 matches
L
Karen Miller / Valeria Perdomochamps
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Andi Berger
−0.018below expectation — took 47% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Kedge
−0.004better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Joann Komanowski / Denise Mandelbaum
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Kedge
−0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelly Kedge
+0.013about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Nicole Reyes / Melissa Kwong-Blais
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Holland
−0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Ballard
−0.027below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kelley Oakley / Merrilu Kutcher
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kedge
+0.030better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Maryann Goodsell / Elizabeth Hansen
2026-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Toni Jackson
−0.025below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Amy Waters / Sabine Curtis
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Ballard
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Marlaina Harris / Megan Bell
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Ballard
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Andra Starr Scano / Robin Wogalter
2026-04-08 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Kedge
−0.019below expectation — took 57% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-06 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Jones
+0.072better than expected — took 42% of games against 19% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.