Search

Monica Baldwin

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
185 matches · 97W–88L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.24
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
88 of 139
NV · 3.5
139 of 228

Monica is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Monica has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Monica has gone from the 13th to the 81st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
80%
20W–5L · 66% of games
3.5
44.3%
47W–59L · 48.7% of games
6.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 51.2% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dixie Stephens
+0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.013better than expected — took 100% of games against 88% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Chelsea Gray
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.012below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Megan Bender / Liz MacDonald
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
0.012about as expected — took 59% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Valeria Perdomo / Diane Paull
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Kabacy
0.013below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jaclyn O'Malley
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.050better than expected — took 65% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Kabacy
0.020below expectation — took 54% of games against 62% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Luanne Balelo / Lisa Winston
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kirsten Ingram
+0.062better than expected — took 92% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Skye Alleman / Krislyn Millar
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Kabacy
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.