Search

Dixie Stephens

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
268 matches · 117W–151L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.78
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
109 of 134
NV · 3.0
136 of 166

Dixie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Dixie has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Dixie has gone from the 71st to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
55%
44W–36L · 52.3% of games
3.5
7.1%
1W–13L · 25.3% of games
6.0
53.6%
37W–32L · 51.9% of games
7.0
31.5%
29W–63L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history268 matches
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Monica Baldwin
+0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Deborah Davis / Carla Kuhl
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Chevalier
+0.017about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Janis Elliott / Judith Kraus
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Schopp
0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Sheri Cherubino / Juli Kochanski
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Chevalier
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Chevalier
0.012about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Gina Rivera / Kelly Twells
2026-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Schwalbe
+0.012about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
+0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Chevalier
+0.013about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginger Nakamura
0.006better than expected — took 100% of games against 85% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-03-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wacharee Rosenberg
0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Debbie D'Amato / Rhona Alter
2026-03-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Chevalier
+0.048better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Joann Komanowski / Robyn Davies
2026-03-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stefani Warren
0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.