Search

Ginger Nakamura

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
153 matches · 76W–77L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
31 of 73
NV · 3.5
99 of 228

Ginger is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ginger has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Ginger has gone from the 63rd to the 67th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
50%
13W–13L · 49.5% of games
6.0
40%
2W–3L · 57.3% of games
7.0
50.8%
61W–59L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history153 matches
L
Lisa Cook / Nancy Holland
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fay Gallus
0.012below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Leong
0.030below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-03-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dixie Stephens
0.006better than expected — took 100% of games against 85% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Kelly McPherson / Tori Rosenthal
2026-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fay Gallus
+0.055better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
+0.026better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Carol Rapp / Rae Ann Yost
2026-01-22 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Leong
+0.013better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Deborah Davis / Lena Grotz
2025-12-02 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patty Yamano
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Joan Perricone / Annette Whiteside
2025-11-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Leong
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Delgado
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Schnabel
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
Deborah Davis / Merrilu Kutcher
2025-11-04 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ruby Leong
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-1
L
Joan Perricone / Annette Whiteside
2025-10-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcia Loss
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.