Teams

SUN CITY ANTHEM

2025 NTA ADULT 70 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 WOMEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-02vs SPANISH TRAILLost 12
W#1 DoublesGinger Nakamura / Patty Yamano vs Deborah Davis / Lena Grotz4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarcia Loss / Sara Schnabel vs Timora Cereghino / Judith MacKenzie3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRuby Leong / Joan Chevalier vs Arlene Babbitt / Merrilu Kutcher1-6, 2-6
2025-11-18vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Schnabel / Patty Yamano vs Patricia Davis / Sally Zimmerman7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRuby Leong / Ginger Nakamura vs Joan Perricone / Annette Whiteside1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarcia Loss / Wacharee Rosenberg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-11-11vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 30
W#1 DoublesGinger Nakamura / Sara Schnabel vs Minette Curnutt / Lana Penrose7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWacharee Rosenberg / Suelue Anderson vs Carol Rapp / Rae Ann Yost6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarcia Loss / Joan Chevalier vs Annabel Elliott / Annette Bradley6-4, 6-2
2025-11-04vs SPANISH TRAILWon 21
L#1 DoublesWacharee Rosenberg / Patty Yamano vs Arlene Babbitt / Nancy Popek3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRuby Leong / Ginger Nakamura vs Deborah Davis / Merrilu Kutcher6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSuelue Anderson / Sara Schnabel vs Melanie Cortez / Karen Shier6-2, 7-5
2025-10-28vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVLost 12
L#1 DoublesGinger Nakamura / Marcia Loss vs Joan Perricone / Annette Whiteside4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Sara Schnabel vs Debbie Fox / Patricia Davis4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRuby Leong / Mary Anne van Liere vs Nancy Joslin / Sally Zimmerman7-6, 7-5
2025-10-21vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 30
W#1 DoublesWacharee Rosenberg / Patty Yamano vs Lana Penrose / Carol Rapp6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarcia Loss / Ginger Nakamura vs Patricia Hawkins / Marcela Urcia6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSuelue Anderson / Ruby Leong vs Orelle Gibson / Kay Higer6-2, 6-0
2025-10-14vs SPANISH TRAILLost 03
L#1 DoublesWacharee Rosenberg / Patty Yamano vs Deborah Davis / Lena Grotz7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGinger Nakamura / Mary Anne van Liere vs Karen Shier / Melanie Cortez2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Suelue Anderson vs Timora Cereghino / Judith MacKenzie1-6, 3-6
2025-10-07vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GVWon 21
W#1 DoublesGinger Nakamura / Patty Yamano vs Lisa Williams / Sally Zimmerman6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSuelue Anderson / Ruby Leong vs Patricia Davis / Joan Perricone6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Sara Schnabel vs April Giuffria / Nancy Joslin6-3, 6-1
2025-09-30vs WHITNEY MESA PARKWon 21
W#1 DoublesLavenia Ferguson / Ginger Nakamura vs Lana Penrose / Carol Rapp6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSuelue Anderson / Ruby Leong vs Ingrid Fitzgerald / Rae Ann Yost6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJoan Chevalier / Mary Anne van Liere vs Annabel Elliott / Patricia Hawkins5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Ginger Nakamura
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.21
Ruby Leong
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.20
Sara Schnabel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Wacharee Rosenberg
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Patty Yamano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Suelue Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Joan Chevalier
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Lavenia Ferguson
published
Marcia Loss
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Anne van Liere
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruby Leong + Wacharee Rosenberg131156% games+4.3% vs expected
Ginger Nakamura + Joan Chevalier1643% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Nakamura + Sara Schnabel4350% gamesnot enough data
Mary Anne van Liere + Joan Chevalier2340% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Nakamura + Ruby Leong3260% gamesnot enough data
Mary Anne van Liere + Suelue Anderson134 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Loss + Ruby Leong314 matchesnot enough data
Marcia Loss + Wacharee Rosenberg134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ginger Nakamura
76W–77L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Ruby Leong
56W–33L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Sara Schnabel
29W–28L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Wacharee Rosenberg
79W–67L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Patty Yamano
111W–144L career · 6 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
3
Suelue Anderson
28W–23L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
2.98
3
Joan Chevalier
92W–124L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Lavenia Ferguson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcia Loss
26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Anne van Liere
28W–62L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.