Search

Patty Yamano

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
255 matches · 111W–144L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
62%
down to 3.0
38%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 38% down · 62% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.02. Higher than today’s 2.98 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
73 of 73
NV · 3.5
223 of 228

Patty is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Patty has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Patty has gone from the 77th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
50%
36W–36L · 51.1% of games
4.0
29.1%
23W–56L · 43.7% of games
7.0
68.3%
41W–19L · 56.6% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
21.4%
6W–22L · 36.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history255 matches
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Ferrence
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Elizabeth McManus / Christine LaBarre
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joann Komanowski
+0.044better than expected — took 53% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Valorie Tobler / Jennifer Blais
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Mullin
0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Mullin
0.020below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Julie Hughes / Jennifer Hall
2026-04-01 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Mullin
0.028below expectation — took 35% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Isler
+0.002below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Nancy Holland / Laura Larsen
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Ferrence
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Joan Perricone / Marisela Giordano
2026-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joann Komanowski
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Patricia Hawkins / Tori Rosenthal
2026-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Zimmerman
+0.058better than expected — took 67% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Margaret Pettigrew / Kimberly Simons
2026-02-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Isler
0.028below expectation — took 37% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sally Zimmerman
0.052below expectation — took 35% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Lori LaBarbera / Tricia Colbert
2026-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joann Komanowski
+0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.