Search

Ingrid Fitzgerald

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
168 matches · 77W–91L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
19 of 22
NV · 3.0
130 of 166

Ingrid is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ingrid has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.5201920202021202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Ingrid has gone from the 80th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
30.6%
22W–50L · 43.6% of games
7.0
60%
48W–32L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.4% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history168 matches
L
Kelly McPherson / Karen Miller
2026-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rae Ann Yost
+0.011about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Karen Shier / Michelle Beckwith
2026-03-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
0.012below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.027better than expected — took 43% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Tharika Irvin / Mitchell Pohlmanmixed
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard van Diepen
+0.000better than expected — took 47% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Karen Petersen / Pamela Rusk
2026-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
+0.052better than expected — took 65% of games against 41% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Scot Turner / Joni Kerbymixed
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Asad Nawaz
+0.000better than expected — took 46% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Daniel Pursel / Rebecca Littlemixed
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard van Diepen
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 46% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Bambi Montag / Patricia Delgado
2026-01-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annabel Elliott
+0.003about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Nicole Medas / Thomas Schinabeckmixed
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard van Diepen
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2024-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Talley
+0.065better than expected — took 100% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rae Ann Yost
+0.058better than expected — took 61% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 5-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.