← Search

Richard van Diepen

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 123W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Richard van Diepen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history193 matches
L
2026-09-09 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jim Aktac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Borenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Borenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with David Leibner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Daniel Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · NV2/Luna/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Luna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-31 · NV2/Luna/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph DeMilliano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-10 · NV2/Luna/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph DeMilliano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · NV2/Luna/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph DeMilliano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
66%
99W–51L · 53.6% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.8% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.2% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
126 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
16 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe