Search

Richard van Diepen

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
191 matches · 123W–68L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 33 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
34 of 129
NV · 4.0
48 of 203

Richard is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Richard has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Richard has gone from the 73rd to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
66.9%
99W–49L · 53.8% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.8% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.2% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history191 matches
L
Brett Wachter / Kota Cook
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Borenstein
0.050below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with David Leibner
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Jason Tang / Michael Delozierchamps
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Daniel Lee
0.016below expectation — took 37% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
David Needham / Martin Mitchell
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Luna
+0.006about as expected — took 56% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Darin Hoesel / Michael Springer
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph DeMilliano
+0.035better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Brad Cunningham / Raj Singh
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Lee
+0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
David Altfas / Derek Barraclough
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph DeMilliano
+0.001about as expected — took 56% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Josiah Garlan / Jason Tang
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Hansen
+0.040better than expected — took 59% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Gary Herzfeld / Kirk Howser
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph DeMilliano
+0.013better than expected — took 58% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Lee
+0.008better than expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Brook Lee / Paul Theobald
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Philip Luna
0.035below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Jack Hogan / David Holmes
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Stover
+0.006about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.