Search

Kirk Howser

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
286 matches · 156W–130L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.87
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
95%
stay 4.0
5%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.82. Lower than today’s 3.87 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
15 of 129
NV · 4.0
20 of 203

Kirk is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kirk has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kirk has gone from the 22nd to the 86th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
47%
55W–62L · 49.4% of games
4.5
48%
12W–13L · 48.1% of games
8.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.7% of games
7.0mixed
89.7%
26W–3L · 60.6% of games
7.5mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 51.5% of games
8.0mixed
56.4%
22W–17L · 51.2% of games
8.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history286 matches
W
Patrick Stover / Larry Malinowski
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeremy Christensen
+0.006better than expected — took 68% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Andrew Chong / Derek Barraclough
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Keller Ii
0.021below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Tyler Gaston / Kota Cook
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin McPartlin
0.058below expectation — took 29% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Robert Kinas / Matt Rowley
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven McCrary
+0.040better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacia Walker
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Jeff Ng / Jason Schrock
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Kuhnwald
0.009about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
William Anstett / David Morgan
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Keller Ii
+0.022better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Dan Michalski / Eric Chun
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Meservey
+0.010better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Joseph DeMilliano / Richard van Diepen
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Herzfeld
0.014below expectation — took 42% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin McPartlin
+0.026better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Andrew Chong / Dmitriy Kosyagin
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Herzfeld
0.020below expectation — took 44% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Raul Martinez / Albert Sanchez
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Roth
+0.019better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.