← Search

Todd Kuhnwald

North Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2023
252 matches · 119W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.69
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
North Las Vegas · 4.0
4 of 6
NV · 4.0
101 of 203

Todd is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Todd has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.0201920202021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Todd has gone from the 16th to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
51.3%
61W–58L · 49.5% of games
4.5
32.4%
12W–25L · 44.1% of games
7.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 57.4% of games
7.5mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
51.6%
16W–15L · 51.3% of games
8.5mixed
20%
2W–8L · 42.4% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history252 matches
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Shook
−0.015better than expected — took 100% of games against 89% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
N/Amixed
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami Kuhnwald
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 80% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jeff Ng / Jason Schrock
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirk Howser
−0.009about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Daniel Dragnev / Joseph DeMilliano
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Shook
−0.007below expectation — took 20% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Tyler Gaston / Nick Arriola
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Shook
+0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Allen Morgan / David Morgan
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lucas
−0.009below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Dan Michalski / Eric Chun
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Meservey
−0.027below expectation — took 46% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami Kuhnwald
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Zack Messer / Julie MacDonaldmixed
2026-01-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami Kuhnwald
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami Kuhnwald
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tami Kuhnwald
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Alexander Martin / Joseph Guerrero-Lopez
2023-12-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander van der Enden
−0.019about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.