Search

Jennifer Cerny

Henderson, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
373 matches · 235W–138L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 47 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
62%
stay 4.0
38%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.90. Lower than today’s 3.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 4.0
1 of 49
NV · 4.0
4 of 203

Jennifer is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jennifer has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jennifer has gone from the 30th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
92.3%
36W–3L · 72.6% of games
3.5
76.3%
58W–18L · 58.2% of games
4.0
55.9%
114W–90L · 53.1% of games
4.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 47.2% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 45.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history373 matches
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Jenny Grob
+0.031better than expected — took 65% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Jacqueline Prestileo
0.037below expectation — took 42% of games against 60% expected
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Anahi Sanchez / Josephine McPeakchamps
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Kelly Elwart
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Christine Blake / Heather Morgansonchamps
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Kelly Elwart
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Ruby Marine / Camilla Wells
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannan Ohlson
0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Teddy Stantcheva / Michael Lumixed
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kota Cook
+0.000better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Marijo Peterson / Shellene Goudge
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candra Milohnic
+0.011better than expected — took 75% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Kimberly Taeubel / Katherine Olivier
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daria Shalina
+0.002about as expected — took 42% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Elwart
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn McCullough
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Sandra Zanella / Rosemary Turner
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanie Wolfgramm
0.015below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Bill Oakley / Amanda Parson Siegelmixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Brandon Christopher
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.