Search

Kimberly Taeubel

LAS VEGAS, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
276 matches · 172W–104L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
24%
down to 4.0
76%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 15% down · 85% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.08. Higher than today’s 4.06 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 4.5
27 of 61

Kimberly is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kimberly has been 4.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Kimberly has gone from the 57th to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.5
67.3%
136W–66L · 58% of games
5.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.9% of games
9.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 58.9% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 35.3% of games
9.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history276 matches
W
Aida Tracy / Belinda Smith
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caitlin Murphy
+0.029better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Jennifer Cerny / Daria Shalina
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Olivier
0.002about as expected — took 58% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marne Darrall
+0.001better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Belinda Smith / Nicola Wien
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Creamer
+0.056better than expected — took 67% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madisen Cherry
0.027below expectation — took 63% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Catherine Pfarrer
0.059below expectation — took 71% of games against 85% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Mary Lynn Weber / Lesley Chan
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madisen Cherry
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Morgan Daley
0.008about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Shannan Ohlson / Peggy Wu
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madisen Cherry
+0.040better than expected — took 86% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-03-30 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Gallant
0.023about as expected — took 57% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Anne Martz / McKenzie Anderson
2026-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Olivier
+0.030better than expected — took 60% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Andraea Drabenstott / Alejandra Quiroschamps
2026-03-06 · #2 Doubles · with Madisen Cherry
0.019below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.